Goldfarb, Neal. “The Use of Corpus Linguistics in Legal Interpretation.” Annual Review of Linguistics 7 (2021): 473-491.

Tobia, Kevin. “The Corpus and the Courts.” University of Chicago Law Review Online (2021).

Phillips, James Cleith, and Josh Blackman. “Corpus Linguistics and Heller.” Wake Forest Law Review 56, no. 609 (2021).

Mouritsen, Stephen C. “Natural Language and Legal Interpretation.” Brooklyn Law Review 86, no. 2 (2021): 533.

Stout, A., Coetzee, D., & Romer, U. (2020). “We the Citizens?’: A Corpus Linguistic Inquiry into the Use of ‘People’ and ‘Citizens’ in the Founding Era.” Ga. St. UL Rev., 36, 665.

Moller, Mark, and Lawrence B. Solum. “Corporations and the Original Meaning of” Citizens” in Article III.” Hastings LJ 72 (2020): 169.

Solan, Lawrence M. “Corpus linguistics as a method of legal interpretation: Some progress, some questions.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 33 (2020): 283-298.

Haoshan Ren, Margaret Wood, Clark D. Cunningham, Noor Abbady, Ute Römer, Heather Kuhn, & Jesse Egbert, “Questions Involving National Peace and Harmony” or “Injured Plaintiff Litigation”? The Original Meaning of “Cases” in Article III of the Constitution, 36 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 535 (2020).

Cunningham, Clark D. and Egbert, Jesse, Corpora and Analyzing Legal Discourse in the United States (March 13, 2020). Routledge Handbook of Corpus Approaches to Discourse Analysis (Eric Friginal & Jack Hardy, eds. 2020 Forthcoming).

Gries, Stefan Th. “Corpora and legal interpretation: Corpus approaches to ordinary meaning in legal interpretation.” The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (2020): 628-643.

Cunningham, Clark D. and Egbert, Jesse, Using Empirical Data to Investigate the Original Meaning of ‘Emolument’ in the Constitution (October 23, 2019). 36 Georgia State University Law Review 465 (2020), Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2019-15, Georgia State University Workshop on Law & Linguistics, October 18, 2019.

Thomas R. Lee & James C. Philips, Data-Driven Originalism, 167 U. Pa. L. Rev. 261 (2019).

Lawrence B. Solum, Triangulating Public Meaning: Corpus Linguistics, Immersion, and the Constitutional Record, 2017 BYU L. Rev. 1621 (2018).

Jennifer L. Mascott, Who Are “Officers of the United States”?, 70 Stanford L. Rev. 443 (2018).

Thomas R. Lee & Stephen C. Mouritsen, Judging Ordinary Meaning, 127 Yale L. J. 788 (2018).

Stephen C. Mouritsen, Corpus Linguistics in Legal Interpretation— An Evolving Interpretive Framework, 6 INT. J. LANG. & LAW 67 (2017).

Solum, Lawrence B., Triangulating Public Meaning: Corpus Linguistics, Immersion, and the Constitutional Record (April 26, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3019494 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3019494

Neal Goldfarb, A Lawyer’s Introduction to Meaning in the Framework of Corpus Linguistics, 2017 BYU L. Rev. 1359 (2018)

Stefan Th. Gries and Brian G. Slocum, Ordinary Meaning and Corpus Linguistics, 2017 BYU L. Rev. 1417 (2018).

Hanjo Hamann and Friedemann Vogel, Evidence-Based Jurisprudence Meets Legal Linguistics—Unlikely Blends Made in Germany, 2017 BYU L. Rev. 1473 (2018).

Carissa Byrne Hessick, Corpus Linguistics and the Criminal Law, 2017 BYU L. Rev. 1503 (2018).

Jake Linford, Datamining the Meaning(s) of Progress, 2017 BYU L. Rev. 1531 (2018).

Jennifer L. Mascott, The Dictionary as a Specialized Corpus, 2017 BYU L. Rev. 1557 (2018).

James C. Phillips and Jesse Egbert, Advancing Law and Corpus Linguistics: Importing Principles and Practices from Survey and Content Analysis Methodologies to Improve Corpus Design and Analysis, 2017 BYU L. Rev. 1589 (2018).

Lawrence M. Solan and Tammy Gales, Corpus Linguistics as a Tool in Legal Interpretation, 2017 BYU L. Rev. 1311 (2018).

Mark C. Suchman, The Power of Words: A Comment on Hamann and Vogel’s Evidence-Based Jurisprudence Meets Legal Linguistics—Unlikely Blends Made in Germany, 2017 BYU L. Rev. 1751  (2018).

Lee J. Strang, How Big Data Can Increase Originalism’s Methodological Rigor: Using Corpus Linguistics to Reveal Original Language Conventions, 50 U.C, Davis L. Rev. 1181 (2017)

Daniel Ortner, The Merciful Corpus: The Rule of Lenity, Ambiguity and Corpus Linguistics, Boston U. Public Interest L. J. 101 (2016).

Lawrence M. Solan & Tammy A. Gales, Finding Ordinary Meaning in Law: The Judge, the Dictionary or the Corpus?, 1 INT’L J. LEGAL DISCOURSE 253 (2016).

Lawrence M. Solan, Can Corpus Linguistics Help Make Originalism Scientific?, 126 YALE L.J. F. 57 (27 May 2016).

James C Phillips, Daniel M. Ortner & Thomas R. Lee, Corpus Linguistics & Original Public Meaning: A New Tool to Make Originalism More Empirical, 126 Yale L.J. F. 21 (18 May 2016)

D. Carolina Núñez, War of the Words: Aliens, Immigrants, Citizens, and the Language of Exclusion, 2013 BYU L. Rev. 1517 (2013).

Stephen C. Mouritsen, Hard Cases and Hard Data: Assessing Corpus Linguistics as an Empirical Path to Plain Meaning. 13 Col. Science & Tech. L. Rev. 156 (2011).

Stephen C. Mouritsen, The Dictionary is Not a Fortress: Definitional Fallacies and a Corpus-Based Approach to Plain Meaning, 2010 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 1915 (2010)

Solan, Lawrence M., The New Textualists’ New Text. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 38, pp. 2027-62, 2005, Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 35.

Vijay K. Bhatia, Nicola M. Langton and Jane Lung, “Legal discourse: Opportunities and threats
for corpus linguistics” in Connor, Ulla, and Upton, Thomas A., eds. Discourse in the Professions : Perspectives from corpus linguistics. (Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2004.)